#Scaffold rental cost manual

Manual equipment counting was not only tedious, it also led to inaccurate designs. This was the case with one of our own customers, Skyline Scaffold. These mistakes mean spending more time on the job site and expending more on labor costs, which translates into higher operating costs. The business then needs to go back to the drawing board (literally, if you’re using manual design and counting methods) to correct the cost estimation.Ī worst-case scenario would be to send the wrong materials to a job site. In your design, you used normal base jacks instead of swivel jacks. Scenario: In the heat of getting the scaffolding proposal done, you overlooked the fact that the job site is on a sloping surface. Coupled with a disconnected scaffolding system, just a small design inaccuracy can lead to expensive material and cost miscalculations. A competitive estimate is one of the keys to landing that bid and getting the proposal approved by clients.īut let’s face it, the scaffolding industry and its competitive bidding nature may cause companies to underestimate the project scope and rush through the entire process. Inaccurate Material Calculation Leads to Inaccurate Cost EstimatesĪfter scaffolding design and material calculation comes cost estimation. The distinct disconnect between manual scaffolding design process and material calculation will only result in design rework and delayed building time. You must then integrate AutoCAD with a counter app to get the BOM.

For example, AutoCAD only gets the designing part right the same can’t be said for material calculation. But these solutions lack capabilities needed by scaffolding companies. Method 2: Non-industry-specific solutions like AutoCAD are widely used to design scaffolding. On the other hand, many companies also use a more modernized approach to designing scaffolds and counting materials. And more complex designs only lead to a higher risk of human error in calculating scaffolding materials manually. However, manually sourcing and inputting this information poses a risk of data inaccuracy.

#Scaffold rental cost software

Method 1: Given the complexity of non-industry-specific software like AutoCAD, you may still resort to low-tech hand-drawn scaffolding design, which is then counted manually for the Bill of Materials (BOM). Then, proceed with designing the scaffolding using one of the two methods below: No matter the case, the next step would be to design scaffolding as per project requirements.īut to design and calculate scaffolding materials, you must gather building information like planned use, total working area, height and length of scaffolding, maximum live and dead load weight. Or maybe there’s a new scaffolding bid that you’ve got your sights on.

Scenario: Perhaps a client has approached you with a scaffolding proposal request. Disconnect Between Scaffolding Design and Material Calculation To address the challenges with current calculation methods, first let’s visualize how scaffolding jobs come about and are usually managed. No doubt, relying on established scaffolding material and cost calculation is convenient as everyone in your organization is used to the inner workings of your company.īut familiarity doesn’t always translate into improved efficiency. Want to know more? You’re in the right place, just keep reading! Challenges with Current Scaffolding Material and Cost Calculation Methods This is where modern, industry-specific software can be beneficial. That’s why it’s so important to get your calculations right, the first time. Worse, you end up wasting precious time to amend your mistakes and can even lose credibility among your customers. You know how frustrating it can be when just a small mistake results in expensive rework. However, many companies still rely on legacy methods like manual scaffold design and material calculation. They allow a company to track its scaffolding inventory and furnish jobs with adequate materials at the most profitable rate. Material and cost calculations form a major part of a scaffolding business.